We Priced 17 AI SDR Tools for a Team of One. Nothing Exists Under $99.
Every pricing page read on 9 August 2026, priced against one scenario: 500 prospects a month on email and LinkedIn, one person. The cheapest workable stack is $111.34/month across three separate vendors. Median gap between the price shown and the price paid: 3.1×.
We read the pricing page of every AI SDR and outreach tool we could find on 9 August 2026 — seventeen of them — and priced each one against a single scenario: 500 prospects a month, on email and LinkedIn, run by one person. The cheapest assembly that actually holds is $111.34/month, and it takes three separate vendors plus mailboxes bought outside all of them. Across the nine stacks we could assemble from published prices, the median advertised entry price is $49 and the median real monthly cost is $156.54 — a ratio of 3.1×. Below $99 there is nothing.
Published 9 August 2026 · Last updated 9 August 2026 · All vendor pages read on 9 August 2026. Exchange rate 1 EUR = 1.155 USD (US Federal Reserve H.10, 6 August 2026); every conversion is marked ≈. We recheck this page when a vendor changes a published price and restate the date at the top when we do.
Disclosure first, because it changes how you should read the table. We build Lead Scorer, which competes with several tools below. Lead Scorer is in the table with its real prices and its real limits, priced under exactly the same assumptions as everyone else — and it comes out as the most expensive assembled stack in this scenario. That is the point of putting it there. A comparison where the author's product wins is a brochure.
The scenario, fixed before any price was looked up
A price only means something against a workload. Ours is one person trying to start 500 new conversations a month on both channels. Everything below follows from these assumptions, which were written down before the first pricing page was opened.
| Assumption | Value | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 500 new prospects contacted per month | The scenario |
| Email sequence | 3 touches each → 1,500 emails/month, ~68 a working day | Standard short sequence |
| Capacity per mailbox | 30 cold emails a day | 2026 deliverability consensus: 20–50/day, 20–30 to stay human-shaped |
| Mailboxes needed | 3 (3 × 30 × 22 = 1,980 capacity for 1,500 of use) | Arithmetic of the two rows above |
| Mailbox cost | $7 each on annual Google Workspace Business Starter → $21/month | workspace.google.com — official |
| Secondary domains | 2 × $10.44/year → $1.74/month | Cloudflare Registrar, at cost |
| Email lookups | 70% find rate → ~750 lookups for 500 addresses | Our assumption, not a source. Flagged as such. |
| LinkedIn ceiling | ~100 invitations a week ≈ 400 a month per account | Soft limit, consistent across automation vendors |
| Billing | Annual commitment taken wherever it exists | The assumption most favourable to vendors. Totals below are floors. |
| Sales Navigator | Excluded ($119.99/month if your targeting needs it) | Add $90–$120 to every row if you need it |
One consequence of that LinkedIn ceiling deserves its own line, because it breaks the scenario before any pricing does. 500 prospects a month is about 115 invitations a week, above the ~100 soft limit. A single LinkedIn account cannot reach 500 prospects a month. Every total below therefore models 500 on email and roughly 400 on LinkedIn. Actually hitting 500 on both means a second LinkedIn identity, and four vendors rebill that as a seat.
The master table
Three labels, never mixed. Official means read on a page the vendor controls on 9 August 2026. Reported means a third party said it and the vendor did not — we keep those visible and never call them prices. Not published means the vendor does not publish the figure, which is a finding in its own right rather than a hole to fill with an estimate. Nothing here was estimated, extrapolated or reconstructed.
Pure-play AI SDRs
| Tool | Entry price shown | Real solo cost, 500/month | LinkedIn at entry | Overage rate | Source status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artisan (Ava) | None. All three tiers say "Pricing scoped on your plan" | Not computable | Ambiguous — "social", LinkedIn never named | Not published | Official absence — artisan.co/pricing, demo-gated |
| 11x (Alice) | $3,750/month, annual only = $45,000/year | $3,750 (infrastructure included) | Not listed on the pricing page | Not published | Official, but on a URL the homepage does not link; /pricing returns 404 |
| AiSDR | $250/month (Solo, 200 contacts) · $900/month (Explore, 800 contacts) | $720 (Explore, annual) — Solo cannot hold 500 prospects | Yes, one account from entry | Mechanism published, rate not published | Official, fully public — aisdr.com/pricing |
| Qualified (Piper) | None | Not computable — and out of scope: Piper is inbound | No LinkedIn channel | Not published | Official absence, demo-gated. Vendr reports a $65,000/year median over 187 purchases |
| Coldreach | None — /pricing returns 404 | Not computable | Not published | Not published | Official absence. G2 states no pricing was provided. A "$899/month" figure circulates; we will not print it as a price |
| Salesforge (Agent Frank) | $499/month, billed quarterly (~$1,497 up front) | $535 with Infraforge | Yes — unlimited LinkedIn senders | $0.25/contact above 2,000/month | Official, public — salesforge.ai |
| Gojiberry | $99/month (Pro) | $99 (1,800 prospects/month claimed) | Yes — 2 LinkedIn accounts | Not published | Reported only. The site returns HTTP 403 to automated reads; four concordant third-party reviews, no vendor page |
| Reply.io (Jason) | $500/month annual, $800 monthly (1,000 contacts) | $500 | Yes — 2 LinkedIn accounts | Published credit packs | Official, and machine-readable— one of two in the panel |
| Rox | $0 (Starter, 2,000 actions) · "from $50/month" (Core) | Not computable — no sending channel of its own | n/a | No rate; you renew early to reset | Official, public |
| Persana AI | Dead. Merged into Rox, billing stopped 1 April 2026, data deleted 2 May 2026 — announced by the vendor. | ||||
Data, sequencers and multichannel
| Tool | Entry price shown | Real solo cost, 500/month | LinkedIn at entry | Overage rate | Source status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smartlead | $32/month annual, $39 monthly (Base) — the panel's floor | $111.34, with Waalaxy as a third vendor for LinkedIn (see the stacks table below) | No, at any tier. There is no upgrade path to LinkedIn | Not published on sends or contacts | Official, and machine-readable — the other of the two |
| Instantly | $37.60/month annual, $47 monthly (Growth, sending only) | ≈ $128 | No | None — upgrade or stop | Official, public; mailbox infrastructure priced in-app only |
| Apollo | $49/seat/month annual (Basic) | ≈ $130 — Professional at $79 is mandatory past one mailbox | No — prospecting extension, not a sending channel | Not published. Two third-party sources disagree by 8× | Official, public — apollo.io/pricing. Organization tier forces 3 seats = $357/month |
| Lemlist | $55/month annual (Email plan, per workspace, unlimited users) | ≈ $147 — Multichannel required for LinkedIn | No. LinkedIn requires Multichannel at $87 per user, and the billing unit changes with it | $0.05 per verified email, $0.20 per phone | Official, public. No official EUR price could be captured from a US IP — the currency selector did not render |
| Clay | $167/month annual, $185 monthly (Launch) | ≈ $256 — Clay posts nothing, so add a sequencer and LinkedIn | No — no sending channel at all | +30% premium, credits "from $0.05"; Actions have no overage | Official, public — clay.com/pricing |
| La Growth Machine | €50/identity/month annual (€60 monthly); LGM also publishes $60/$70 itself | ≈ $188 — Basic (250 enriched leads) and Pro (400) both fall short; Ultimate required | Yes — LinkedIn and email from Basic. The only one of its group | €0.01/credit, full enrichment 5 credits → €0.05/lead | Official, and publishes EUR, USD and GBP. Prices live in the page's JavaScript, not the served HTML |
| Waalaxy | €19/user/month (Pro, 300 invitations) | ≈ $57 (Advanced €49, the first tier that holds ~400 invitations) | LinkedIn only. Pro and Advanced cannot send a single email; email starts at Business, €69 — 3.6× the advertised entry | Not published (credit packs). LinkedIn Inbox add-on €20/month | Official, public — but the "−50% annual" discount amount is published nowhere |
| useArtemis | Two live grids. /pricing, linked in the nav: $69,
enrichment only, no sending. /upgrade, unlinked: $99, email and
LinkedIn | ≈ $122 (Starter $99 + mailboxes) | Yes — at $99, not at $69 | Not published | Official on both pages. The real tariff sits on a URL the navigation does not link |
| Lead Scorer (ours) | €0 CRM · €20/month (Enrichment, no sending) · €49 Solo · €99 Pro · €199 Scale — yearly billing takes 20% off Solo, Pro and Scale | ≈ $309 — see the calculation below. The most expensive assembled stack here | No. LinkedIn starts at Pro, €99, with 1 account; Scale carries 2 | Published per action: 1 credit per lead enriched, 3 per email found, 15 per phone; packs from €49/1,000 | Official — but there is no /pricing URL (that path
redirects to a login screen); the grid is an anchor on the homepage, plus /llm-info and llms.txt. No USD price published |
The nine stacks, cheapest first
All totals in USD per month, annual commitment, mailboxes and domains included. These are the seventeen surveyed tools only — Lead Scorer is priced separately further down and is deliberately excluded from the medians, because including your own product in your own benchmark's average is how benchmarks stop being worth reading.
| Stack | What is in it | Real total | Price shown | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A · Smartlead + Waalaxy + Google | Smartlead Base $32 (2,000 contacts, 6,000 sends, 2,000 verifications included) + Waalaxy Advanced $56.60 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $111.34 | $32 | 3.5× |
| B · useArtemis | Starter $99 from the unlinked page + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $121.74 | $69 (the page the nav links) | 1.8× |
| C · Salesforge suite | Salesforge Pro $40 + Leadsforge $49 + Mailforge $30 (10-mailbox minimum) + 3 domains $3.50 | $122.50 | $40 | 3.1× |
| D · Lemlist Multichannel | $87/user + 750 verified emails at $0.05 = $37.50 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $147.24 | $55 | 2.7× |
| E · Instantly + Waalaxy + Google | Outreach Growth $37.60 + Credits Growth $37.60 + Waalaxy Advanced $56.60 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 + verification $2 | $156.54 | $37.60 | 4.2× |
| F · Apollo + Waalaxy + Google | Apollo Professional $79 (Basic gives one mailbox) + Waalaxy Advanced $56.60 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $158.34 | $49 | 3.2× |
| G · La Growth Machine | Ultimate $165 (LGM's own annual USD price) + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $187.74 | $60 (Basic) | 3.1× |
| H · Reply.io Multichannel | $89/user + 1,000 Live Data credits $119 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $230.74 | $49 | 4.7× |
| I · Clay + sequencer + LinkedIn | Clay Launch $167 + Instantly Growth $37.60 + Waalaxy Advanced $56.60 + 3 mailboxes $21 + domains $1.74 | $283.94 | $167 | 1.7× |
Median advertised price $49. Median real cost $156.54. Median ratio 3.1×. One widely cited comparison advises budgeting 1.5× to 2× the sticker price. Computed off vendor pages rather than off vibes, the real number is more than double that advice.
And the fully managed end, for scale: AiSDR Explore at $720/month is the cheapest AI SDR with a published price that can hold the scenario. Agent Frank sits at $535. 11x sits at $3,750. For exactly the same work, the market spans 34× from $111 to $3,750.
Pricing ourselves under the same rules
Lead Scorer now bills yearly as well as monthly, at 20% off — the same assumption that favours everybody else in the table. We priced ourselves on the monthly rate anyway, so the total below is a ceiling where the rest of the table shows floors. Here is the arithmetic, using our published per-action rates:
- Scale, €199/month (€159 a month on yearly billing) is the first plan that clears the scenario: 3 email inboxes matching the 3 mailboxes the volume needs, 2 LinkedIn accounts, 2,000 credits, €80 of AI budget. Solo (€49) has one inbox and 500 credits; Pro (€99) has one inbox and 1,000. Neither holds 1,500 emails a month.
- Credits: 2,750 needed, 2,000 included. 500 enrichments at 1 credit, plus 750 email lookups at 3 credits each — and lookups are billed per lead requested, not per address found, so the 70% find rate is paid for in full. The shortfall takes a 1,000-credit pack at €49.
- €248/month ≈ $286.44, plus the same $21 of Google mailboxes and $1.74 of domains everyone else pays. Total ≈ $309.18.
Against our cheapest paid plan (€20 ≈ $23.10, enrichment only, no sending) that is a ratio of 13.4×. Against the cheapest plan that can send anything (€49 ≈ $56.60), it is 5.5×. Either way it is the widest gap on this page, and the highest total of any assembled stack. Three things follow, and we would rather write them ourselves than have someone else find them:
- Our credit model is the expensive part, not the subscription. Finding an email costs 3 credits whether or not one is found. At 500 prospects a month that single line is roughly €90 of the €248.
- Scale carries the second LinkedIn account. The identity the 500-prospect scenario requires used to exist nowhere on our price list; it is included on Scale now, at no extra charge, where Waalaxy, Lemlist, LGM and AiSDR rebill it as a seat. Solo has no LinkedIn account and Pro stops at one, and that ceiling is real: one account cannot work 500 new prospects a month.
- We publish a LinkedIn quota, which most of the panel does not: the engine caps invitations at 15 per account per day, all campaigns combined, and lower while an account warms up. That is roughly 330–450 a month depending on how you count days, and it is the same physical wall everyone hits — we just wrote it down.
What we do not claim: that $309 is a better deal than $111. On this scenario it is not. The scenario is 500 cold prospects a month, which is a volume play, and volume is the thing our pricing is worst at.
The LinkedIn tax is a multiplier, not a tier
Six of seventeen tools include LinkedIn at entry. Five do not sell it at any price — Smartlead, Instantly, Clay, Apollo and Qualified. For everyone in between, the second channel does not cost a step, it costs a factor:
| Tool | Email-only entry | With LinkedIn | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waalaxy | €19 (Pro — and it cannot send email at all) | €69 (Business) | 3.6× |
| Reply.io | $49 | $118 | 2.4× |
| Lemlist | $55 per workspace, unlimited users | $87 per user | 1.6× — and the billing unit changes underneath you |
| Apollo | $49 | $79 (still no native LinkedIn sending) | 1.6× |
| useArtemis | $69 | $99 | 1.4× |
Waalaxy is the sharpest case and worth stating plainly rather than as a gotcha: it is a LinkedIn tool that also sells email, so its cheap tiers are cheap because they are LinkedIn-only. Someone landing on the €19 price expecting a two-channel product is reading their own assumption, not the page. The multiplier is still 3.6×.
Nobody publishes what going over costs
Twelve of seventeen tools publish no usable overage rate. That includes all four pure-play AI SDRs — Artisan, 11x, AiSDR and Qualified — which is the segment charging the most. AiSDR publishes the mechanism and withholds the rate, which is a specific and deliberate half-step.
The five that do publish something workable:
- Salesforge — $0.25 per contact above 2,000 a month.
- Lemlist — 1 credit = $0.01; a verified email is 5 credits ($0.05), a phone number 20 ($0.20).
- Clay — a 30% premium on top-ups, credits from $0.05. Actions have no overage at all: you change tier or you stop.
- La Growth Machine — €0.01 a credit, full enrichment 5 credits, so €0.05 a lead, minimum purchase 500 credits.
- Reply.io — published credit packs.
The cost of the silence is measurable. Because Apollo publishes no rate, the two third-party figures in circulation are $0.20 and $0.025 per credit — a factor of eight on the line item most likely to surprise you at the end of a good month. That is not a vendor being devious; it is what happens downstream when a number is missing.
Five entry plans that cannot do the job they are priced against
These prices are all real. They just do not buy the scenario, and in each case the constraint is on the same page as the price:
- Apollo Basic, $49 — one mailbox. 1,500 emails a month through one mailbox is 68 a day, far outside any safe deliverability range.
- La Growth Machine Basic, €50 — 250 enriched leads a month, half the target. Pro at €100 gives 400, still short. Ultimate is the first tier that works, at 3× the entry price.
- AiSDR Solo, $250 — 200 contacts sourced a month, 40% of the target.
- Waalaxy Pro, €19 — 300 invitations a month, and no email capability whatsoever.
- useArtemis at $69 — no sending channel of any kind. It is an enrichment product; the sending product is $99 on a different page.
Add to that a cost that is constant and invisible across the whole table: ~$23 a month of email infrastructure that no sequencer includes. "Unlimited mailboxes" — used by Instantly, Smartlead, Salesforge and Lemlist — means unlimited software slots. It is accurate, and it does not reduce your Google Workspace bill by a dollar.
What we refuse to state
The gaps are half of what makes this worth publishing, so they get their own section rather than a footnote:
- Gojiberry's $99 is reported, not official. Its site returns HTTP 403 to automated reads. Four independent reviews agree on the figure and none of them is the vendor. It is the only tool in the panel whose price rests entirely on third parties. A manual browser visit would settle it cheaply, and we have not done that yet.
- We have no official EUR price for Lemlist. Read from a US IP address, the currency selector never rendered. The €69/€87 figures circulating are reported, and if they are right, the euro price is materially worse than the dollar one at current rates. We are not printing them as prices.
- Coldreach publishes nothing at all, and
/pricingreturns 404. The "$899/month" repeated across aggregators appears on no Coldreach page, and G2 records that no pricing was provided. We are leaving that cell empty rather than filling it with an internet rumour. - Artisan's third-party estimates diverge by 4× — one set of sources says $250–$280/month, another says $1,000–$2,500. Vendr has no Artisan page at all. Both ranges are reported here precisely because they contradict each other.
- No purchases were made. Everything comes from public pages, so negotiated prices are out of reach. Vendr's transaction medians are the closest available proxy and are labelled reported throughout.
- Our 70% email find rate is an assumption, not a source. It moves the enrichment line in several stacks. It does not move any conclusion.
What the table actually says
- The segment is priced for a team. Not badly designed, not overpriced for what it does — designed around a sales org with seats, and a solo founder is not the customer it was drawn for. That is a structural observation, and it is checkable line by line above.
- Below $99 the shelf is empty for email plus LinkedIn at 500 prospects a month, and the cheapest thing on it costs $111.34 across three vendors and a Google Workspace account you set up yourself.
- The advertised price is a floor with a median 3.1× above it, and the pieces that make up the gap — mailboxes, domains, verification, the LinkedIn tier, the tier that actually holds your volume — are the pieces nobody puts on a pricing page.
Prices move. Everything here is dated 9 August 2026 and sourced to a page you can open yourself. When a vendor changes a published price we will update the row and move the date at the top — and if you find a figure that has drifted or that we read wrong, we would rather hear it than keep publishing it.
The companion piece, the pricing pages that lie to robots, covers what happened when we tried to read these same seventeen pages the way an AI assistant would. If you want the outreach side rather than the cost side, the cold outreach reply-rate data and the 70-founder first-customers dataset are the two studies underneath it.
Frequently asked questions
What is the cheapest AI SDR stack for a solo founder in 2026?
Priced on vendor pages read on 9 August 2026, the cheapest assembly that can actually run 500 prospects a month across email and LinkedIn is Smartlead Base ($32) plus Waalaxy Advanced (€49 ≈ $56.60) plus three Google Workspace mailboxes ($21) and two secondary domains ($1.74) — $111.34 a month across three separate vendors, with the mailboxes bought outside all of them. No single product covers both channels below that. The cheapest single-vendor option is useArtemis at $99 plus mailboxes, or $121.74 all in.
How much more than the advertised price does an outreach stack actually cost?
Across the nine stacks assembled from published prices, the ratio between the entry price on the pricing page and the real monthly cost for one person at 500 prospects ranges from 1.7× to 4.7×, with a median of 3.1×. Median advertised price: $49. Median real cost: $156.54. The gap is not vendor spin — it is mailboxes, domains, verification credits, the LinkedIn tier and the entry plans that cannot hold the volume they are sold against.
Which AI SDR tools include LinkedIn at their entry price?
Six of the seventeen tools surveyed include LinkedIn at their entry tier. Five do not offer it at any price: Smartlead, Instantly, Clay, Apollo and Qualified. For the rest, opening the second channel is a multiplier rather than a step: Waalaxy 3.6× (€19 to €69, since its two lower tiers cannot send a single email), Reply.io 2.4× ($49 to $118), Lemlist 1.6× with a change of billing unit from $55 per workspace to $87 per user, Apollo 1.6×, useArtemis 1.4×.
Do AI SDR vendors publish what going over your quota costs?
Mostly not. Twelve of the seventeen tools publish no usable overage rate at all, including all four pure-play AI SDRs — Artisan, 11x, AiSDR and Qualified. AiSDR publishes the mechanism but not the rate. Five publish something workable: Salesforge at $0.25 per contact, Lemlist at $0.05 per verified email, Clay at a 30% premium then roughly $0.065 a credit, La Growth Machine at €0.05 per enriched lead, and Reply.io through published credit packs. Where nothing is published, third-party guesses diverge — two sources disagree about Apollo's credit rate by a factor of eight.
Can one LinkedIn account handle 500 prospects a month?
No. The soft ceiling reported consistently across automation vendors is around 100 connection requests a week, or roughly 400 a month. 500 prospects a month works out to about 115 a week, which is above it. Reaching 500 on both channels therefore requires a second LinkedIn identity, and that identity is rebilled as a seat by La Growth Machine (+€60), Waalaxy (+€9.50), Lemlist (+$87) and AiSDR (a tier change). Five tools sell the LinkedIn channel without publishing any invitation quota at all.
How reliable are these prices?
Every figure is labelled. Official means it was read on a page the vendor controls on 9 August 2026. Reported means it came from a third party such as Vendr or a comparison site and is never presented as a price. Not published means the vendor does not publish it, which is treated as a finding rather than a gap to fill in. Nothing was purchased, so negotiated prices are out of reach. Gojiberry's site blocks automated reading, so its price rests entirely on four concordant third-party reviews with no vendor page behind them, and no official EUR price could be captured for Lemlist from a US IP address.